Talk:Saturn V instrument unit
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where are you guys?
[edit]I'm looking for others who worked on the IBM Saturn V Instrument Unit during Project Apollo, 1965 - 1969 at the Kennedy Space Center.
Dick Conklin, Dick, conch@keysy.com IBM IU personnel 216.192.182.129 (talk) 08:39, 16 December 2004
Lunar orbit?
[edit]I'm not aware of any SIVBs going into Lunar orbit; that would require another engine burn as it approached the Moon, with associated fuel. Does anyone have any evidence to support this or should we delete it? Mark Grant 16:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- No S-IVBs ever went into orbit around the Moon. Andy120290 19:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I've removed that comment. Mark Grant 22:50, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Specifications
[edit]The concept of empty weight does not apply to the Instrument Unit; it carried no fuel or bombs, and weighed about the same at the beginning of the mission as later.
Instrument Unit Fact Sheet. Saturn V News Reference. Changed December 1968. P. 1: Weight (average) 4,500 lbs, Diameter 260 inches, Height 36 inches
SA-507 Flight Manual PDF p. 11: Dry weight = At launch weight = 4,306 pounds.
SA-503 Flight Manual PDF p. 11: Dry weight = At launch weight = 4,873 pounds.
I propose to delete the empty weight from the Specifications.
The references quoted above illustrate how the Instrument Unit varied from mission to misson. It was not a single configuration. I will point out in text to accompany some historical images how components were moved around. E.g. some missions had 3 batteries, some 4.
I also propose, therefore, to put a tilde in front of the weight.
Edgar Durbin 01:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, sounds like a good idea to me. Mark Grant 02:06, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Name?
[edit]If it was used on the Saturn 1B as well as the Saturn V, why is it called the Saturn V instrument unit? Thanks, Titan(moon)003 (talk) 19:31, 18 November 2024 (UTC)